No interest in harvesting data
At Computerome, users always have complete control over their data, which is fenced in on Danish soil.
The supercomputer uses an isolated network without internet access, and users can work with confidential data without the risk of the information being shared without consent.
“We must always be able to account for what has happened to the data. This creates a level of trust that makes government institutions, among others, want to use us to store sensitive data, and in some cases, it is the basis for them being able to work with data at all because they know with 100% certainty that this data will not be copied,” says Peter Løngreen.
Every time someone accesses the data, it is recorded, and the logs are stored for 15 years. Computerome has no vested interest in harvesting data and fulfils the strictest requirements for data protection and GDPR compliance.
"Our business model is transparency about what happens to your data - and that's what sets us apart from the competition," says Peter Løngreen, CEO of Computerome.
More data will be sensitive in the future
One of Computerome's customers is the Danish Climate Data Agency, which recently chose to place their climate data on the supercomputer, where they can process complex data sets much faster than before. Among other things, this will support the green transition and contribute to climate-proofing Danish society.
“One of Computerome's strengths is that they are used as a data centre by other public authorities, including the Danish Genome Centre, so we know that security is under control, as well as they are very concerned about limiting the climate footprint,” says Rikke Hougaard Zeberg, Director of the Danish Climate Data Agency.
And while Computerome has so far focused on life science and research with highly sensitive personal data, Peter Løngreen predicts that much more data will need extra security in the future.
“It doesn't take much for data to become personally sensitive or business-critical. For example, climate data sometimes comes down to household level, so I believe that more and more data categorised as non-sensitive today will become so in the future,” he says.