Reason to cry over spilled milk
Having old milk residues from a previous production run sitting in the pipes is no good. Under the dairies’ strict cleaning rules, all the pipes are thoroughly rinsed with cleaning fluid and water before a new production starts. And this is where the problem arises.
The reason is that it is not possible to see whether there are still residues in the pipes after cleaning, which of course must not contaminate the new production. To avoid any doubt, large amounts of ready-to-drink milk are poured through the pipes and into the drains before the new production can begin.
The procedure is not only time-consuming, but also costly and climate-unfriendly. When it comes to the climate, there is actually every reason to cry over spilled milk: Methane from cattle production is one of the biggest climate culprits, and even though beef is associated with significantly higher emissions than milk, figures from Our World in Data show that one litre of milk accounts for an average of 3.15 kg of CO2 equivalents globally.
CO2 equivalents are a conversion of greenhouse gases to the same ‘currency’ so that they can be compared. This is necessary because there are differences in how much the greenhouse gases from different products contribute to global warming. For comparison, figures from Our World in Data show that the CO2 equivalents for almond and soy milk are 0.70 kg and 0.98 kg per litre, respectively.
The 3.15 kg of CO2 equivalents for cow’s milk can be multiplied by 10,000 every single day for every dairy in the world, which adds up to massive emissions of greenhouse gases from which we get nothing but waste.
“We want to create a product that makes economic sense for us and the dairies, and which is also good for our planet,” says Søren Stobbe, professor at DTU Electro and head of the Nexus project.
Replacing expensive alternative
If you look into a dairy, you will typically find a facility full of pipes and sensors. In here, the dairymen can very precisely control the flow rate of the milk as well as the temperature and pressure. But when it comes to identifying what exactly is flowing through the pipes, it is a much more difficult task for the dairymen. This is because the existing spectrometers are both very large and—in spite of the high levels of milk waste—far too expensive to be competitive.
“The spectrometers used by the dairies today cost about EUR 100,000 each. So, you can’t just establish 100 measuring points, as it’s simply too expensive. With our solution, the idea is to build small, compact and lower-priced spectrometers, which means that you can incorporate many more measuring points and thus know for certain when the pipes are ready for the next production run,” says Søren Stobbe.
The new spectrometer is based on advanced nanotechnology, which provides unique possibilities for reducing the size and cost of the technology. However, a number of factors need considering.
“Among other things, we must ensure that our chips do not contain rare materials and that they can be produced under proper conditions. In addition, our technology must be able to run around the clock without using a lot of energy. We believe that this will be possible with our solution,” says Søren Stobbe.
Improving food safety
Right now, the technology is being tested, but the team holds high expectations, and they also expect the technology to be useful in other areas that are not related to food waste.
“I’m very optimistic about the project. There’s a lot of work to be done on the back of the project in terms of actually commercializing our spectrometer. Right now, we have demonstrated our spectrometer concept, and it works reasonably well. And fortunately it looks as though we will be able to overcome the challenges that remain,” says Søren Stobbe.
The team behind the project hopes that the optical spectrometer will become a useful tool in countries with less focus on food safety and food control. In the worst case, this has resulted in the loss of human lives. Our hope is therefore that some of these countries will start using this significantly cheaper microchip solution, so that food production can be monitored to identify ingredients that have no place in the production.
In addition to DTU, the Nexus consortium consists of Foss Analytical A/S, Elionix Inc., and Beamfox Technologies ApS.